North Bay Council, Inc. v. Bruckner
New Hampshire Supreme Court
563 A.2d 428 (1989)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
In 1951, William Morse Cole executed a deed for the conveyance of some real property. The deed imposed several restrictive conditions on the grantee and reserved Cole's right of first refusal on future conveyances. The deed's text explicitly time-limited one restrictive condition to 10 years, but the text made it at least doubtful that the first-refusal clause or any other restrictive condition was time-limited. In 1961, after Cole's death, the grantee offered to sell the property to North Bay Council, Inc. (plaintiff). The council's lawyer, Karl T. Bruckner (defendant), checked Cole's deed and orally advised the council that all of its restrictive conditions were time-limited and had expired. In reliance on Bruckner's opinion, the council went ahead and bought the property in 1962. By 1979, the council realized that the property was unmarketable because the first-refusal clause clouded its title. Cole's heirs claimed the right to purchase the property at the price the council paid for it in 1962. After a court dismissed the council's quiet-title action, the council sued Bruckner for the economic damages it suffered as the result of Bruckner's alleged malpractice. The trial jury returned its verdict for Bruckner, and the council appealed to the New Hampshire Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.