North Carolina State Bar v. Nifong

Amended Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order of Discipline (2007)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

North Carolina State Bar v. Nifong

North Carolina State Bar, Disciplinary Hearing Commission
Amended Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order of Discipline (2007)

Facts

Attorney Michael Nifong (defendant) was a district attorney facing a tough reelection when Crystal Mangum, an exotic dancer, alleged that she was raped by three Duke University lacrosse players. Mangum’s story kept changing, and Mangum had difficulty identifying any attackers from photo lineups. In addition, the rape kits collected from Mangum revealed DNA from multiple men, but none of the DNA matched the accused lacrosse players. Despite this, Nifong charged the three lacrosse players with rape. Nifong then had his experts prepare reports that did not mention that none of the rape-kit DNA matched the accused, and Nifong did not otherwise disclose those findings to defense counsel. Nifong also made false statements to the press claiming that the lacrosse players were not cooperating and that the evidence showed that the lacrosse players had raped Mangum and had used racial slurs while doing so. Further, Nifong repeatedly made false statements to the defense counsel and the court claiming that the prosecutor’s office had turned over all evidence. Eventually, Nifong was forced to turn over approximately 1,800 pages of data. After spending 60 to 100 hours going through the data, the lacrosse players’ lawyers figured out that some key DNA results had not been disclosed. Once the information became public, the North Carolina attorney general cleared the lacrosse players of all charges, and Nifong was charged with professional misconduct.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Williamson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership