Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
N

North Carolina State Conference v. Moore

876 S.E.2d 513 (2022)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

North Carolina State Conference v. Moore

North Carolina Supreme Court
876 S.E.2d 513 (2022)

SC

Facts

The United States Supreme Court determined that certain voting districts in North Carolina were racially gerrymandered in violation of the U.S. Constitution. State legislators elected from those unconstitutionally formed districts proposed amendments to the North Carolina Constitution. The amendments passed with the required two-thirds supermajority in the state legislature. The votes of the unconstitutionally elected legislators were decisive in those votes. The voters of North Carolina then ratified the amendments. The North Carolina State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (plaintiff) brought suit, challenging the constitutional amendments. The trial court invalidated the constitutional amendments. Tim Moore and Philip Berger (defendants), respectively of the North Carolina House of Representatives and Senate, appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Earls, J.)

Dissent (Berger, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Comparative Constitutional Law

Key Terms