This website requires JavaScript. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari.

Options

From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...

North Carolina v. Pearce

United States Supreme Court

395 U.S. 711 (1969)

Facts

Pearce (defendant) was convicted of criminal charges in the state courts of North Carolina. Pearce was sentenced to a term of 12 to 15 years in prison. Several years after his conviction, Pearce’s conviction was reversed and he was afforded a new trial. Pearce was reconvicted at the new trial and given an eight-year prison sentence. The state court would not grant credit for time already served. The new sentence, combined with time already served, amounted to a longer prison term than the original sentence. Pearce appealed and the federal district court and court of appeals held that the longer sentence was unconstitutional. The state of North Carolina petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review, and Pearce’s case was consolidated with the case of Rice. Rice pled guilty to criminal charges in the state courts of Alabama and was sentenced to 10 years in prison. Rice was retried after his original convictions were vacated. At the new trial, Rice was convicted again and sentenced to a total of 25 years in prison. Rice was not granted credit for time served. Rice appealed and both the federal district court and court of appeals held that the longer sentence was unconstitutional. The state of Alabama petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
The procedural disposition (e.g., reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (White, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (Douglas, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence/Dissent (Harlan, J.)

The concurrence/dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the judge’s concurrence in part and dissent in part. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence/Dissent (Black, J.)

The concurrence/dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the judge’s concurrence in part and dissent in part. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 619,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.
Unlock this case brief Read our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.
Learn about our approach Read more about Quimbee

Here's why 619,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Here's why 619,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
35,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
Uniform format for every case brief
Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
Top-notch customer support