From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
North Coast Women’s Care Medical Group v. San Diego County Superior Court
California Supreme Court
189 P.3d 959 (2008)
Facts
Guadalupe T. Benitez (plaintiff) and her partner, Joanne Clark, met with obstetrician and gynecologist Christine Brody (defendant) at North Coast Women’s Care Medical Group (North Coast) (defendant) to discuss fertility treatment. Brody informed Benitez that because of her polycystic ovarian syndrome diagnosis, Benitez may require intrauterine insemination (IUI), which involves the insertion of semen into the uterus by a catheter. Brody then told Benitez that Brody and her colleague, Douglas Fenton, would not perform the procedure on religious grounds. Brody continued to treat Benitez for infertility. Almost a year into treatment, Brody determined that IUI was required. Benitez was ultimately referred to another medical practice. Benitez filed a sexual-orientation discrimination suit against North Coast, Brody, and Fenton on the grounds that the discrimination violated California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (UCRA). North Coast, Brody, and Fenton argued that the UCRA violated their religious freedom and free-speech rights and that a religious exemption should relieve them of liability. Benitez motioned to dismiss the religious-exemption defense, which the trial court granted as applied to the sexual-orientation discrimination. The court of appeals set aside the trial court ruling.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kennard, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
