North Cook Intermediate Service Center v. Village of Skokie
Illinois Circuit Court, Chancery Division
No. 99 CH 12107 (2000)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
The North Cook Intermediate Service Center (center) (plaintiff) was established by the Illinois State Board of Education and operated as a branch of the state government. The center entered into a lease for property in Skokie, Illinois, to build an alternative school for at-risk students with repeated disciplinary problems. The Village of Skokie (village) (defendant) had zoning laws in place to regulate the use of village property. The village informed the center that the center needed to apply for an amendment to the zoning laws and a special-use permit to build the alternative school. The center submitted the requested applications, and the Skokie Plan Commission approved the zoning-law amendment and the special-use application. However, the village voted to overrule the decision and denied the permit and the amendment, stopping the center from being able to build. The center filed suit in Illinois Circuit Court, Chancery Division, claiming that the Illinois Constitution and the state’s school code forbade the village government from enforcing zoning regulations and stopping the building of the school. The center filed a motion for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Maddox, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.