North Dakota Fair Housing Council v. Peterson

625 N.W.2d 551 (2001)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

North Dakota Fair Housing Council v. Peterson

Supreme Court of North Dakota
625 N.W.2d 551 (2001)

Facts

Before they married, Robert and Patricia Kippen (plaintiffs) sought to rent property from David and Mary Peterson (defendants). The Petersons refused to rent to the Kippens because they planned to cohabit while being unmarried. Since its statehood, North Dakota has declared it unlawful for unmarried persons to openly cohabit as though they were married. The Kippens, along with the North Dakota Fair Housing Council (Council) (plaintiff), sued the Petersons for violating the North Dakota Human Rights Act (HRA), which prohibits discrimination in housing on account of a person’s “status with respect to marriage,” among other categories. The trial court dismissed the Council’s claim for lack of standing and awarded summary judgment to the Petersons with respect to the Kippens’ suit. The Kippens and the Council appealed. The Supreme Court of North Dakota considered the Kippens’ appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sandstrom, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 788,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership