North Gualala Water Co. v. State Water Resources Control Board
California Court of Appeals
139 Cal. App. 4th 1577, 43 Cal. Rptr. 3d 821 (2006)
- Written by Curtis Parvin, JD
Facts
The North Gualala Water Company (NGWC) (plaintiff) developed two groundwater wells in Elk Prairie by the North Fork Gualala River. It did not obtain water-right permits to develop the wells, believing that the State Water Resources Control Board (the board) (defendant) had no jurisdiction. California was unique among western states in that it handled surface water and groundwater under different management regimes based on obsolete approaches. The board’s authority extended only to surface waters. However, the scope of the board’s authority was extended by statute to include “subterranean streams flowing through known and definite channels,” distinguishable from groundwater in the soils. NGWC asserted that the wells did not tap into a subterranean stream because a relatively impermeable barrier did not bind the underground channel and the direction of the water flow did not match the course of the channel. The board countered that the wells reached a subterranean stream under its control based on a proposed four-part test: (1) the existence of a subsurface channel (2) with relatively impermeable bed and banks (3) and a known or knowable course (4) with groundwater flowing through. The board contended that the groundwater accessed by the wells met all four parameters, requiring NGWC to have a water-right permit to use the wells. NGWC sought a writ of mandate to compel the board to vacate its decision, contending that it lacked jurisdiction. The trial court upheld the board’s four-part test and analysis, and NGWC appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Margulies, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.