North Shore Auto Financing, Inc. v. Block
Ohio Court of Appeals
188 Ohio App. 3d 48, 934 N.E.2d 381 (2010)

- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Block (plaintiff) bought a car from North Shore Auto Financing, Inc. (defendant). The installment purchase contract charged 25 percent interest per annum, which was the legal maximum. In addition, the contract included a $35 charge for vendor’s single-interest insurance, which paid North Shore the amount due if the property was ever destroyed. The contract did not state that Block could have bought the insurance elsewhere (although none was readily available) or that the insurance cost $35, both of which were required under the Truth in Lending Act for finance charges. Block sued, arguing that the $35 charge should have been counted as a finance charge, which would have put the contract over the legal limit. North Shore responded that the $35 insurance charge was properly included as part of the amount financed and was not subject to the act’s disclosure requirements. The court ruled in North Shore’s favor, and Block appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Boyle, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.