North Shore Steak House, Inc. v. Board of Appeals

282 N.E.2d 606 (1972)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

North Shore Steak House, Inc. v. Board of Appeals

New York Court of Appeals
282 N.E.2d 606 (1972)

JL

Facts

North Shore Steak House, Inc. (North Shore) (plaintiff) leased a plot of land used for a restaurant. The plot of land had a depth of 286 feet from Summer Street. Under the zoning map, the first 200 feet was in the Business “B” District, and the remaining 86 feet was in the Residence “B” District, which was zoned for single-family homes. North Shore paved the available space inside the Business District for parking for the restaurant, but it did not have enough parking for the busy weekend periods. The restaurant had seats for 188 people, but only had parking spaces for 75 to 85 cars. North Shore applied for a special-exception permit and a hardship variance to increase the parking area. The special-exception permit would have permitted the construction of additional parking 25 feet into the Residential District portion of the property. The hardship variance would have extended the parking area into the remaining portion of the property in the Residential District. The Board of Appeals of the Village of Thomaston (defendant) found that the property was not unique or different from other split-zoned property in the village; the hardship, if any, was self-created; the evidence showed that the variance would have an adverse effect on the adjoining property; and that the parking area was sufficient. The board also determined that the special-exception permit would not be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning plan and scheme. The board then denied the requested permit and variance. North Shore appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Burke, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership