Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. Husted

696 F.3d 580 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. Husted

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
696 F.3d 580 (2012)

KS

Facts

Ohio election law required that provisional ballots be cast in the correct precinct and with a completed voter affirmation. In Ohio, voters from more than one precinct voted at the same polling location. Provisional ballots cast at the right location but for the wrong precinct or with deficient affirmations were immediately disqualified, even if the mistakes were caused by poll-worker error. The Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless (the coalition) (plaintiff) sued Jon Husted (defendant) in his capacity as Ohio secretary of state, arguing that the strict application of Ohio’s law with no exception for poll-worker error violated the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. In August 2012, the district court issued a preliminary injunction requiring that wrong-precinct and deficient-affirmation ballots be counted unless Ohio could prove that the poll worker provided correct direction to the voter, but the voter refused to comply. Husted appealed the preliminary injunction as it applied to deficient affirmations. The State of Ohio intervened and appealed the preliminary injunction as applied to the votes from the right location but the wrong precinct.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership