Northeast Research, LLC v. One Shipwrecked Vessel

729 F.3d 197 (2013)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Northeast Research, LLC v. One Shipwrecked Vessel

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
729 F.3d 197 (2013)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Northeast Research, LLC (Northeast) (plaintiff) searched the bottom of Lake Erie for shipwrecks. While searching the lake, Northeast found a shipwreck known as the Dunkirk Schooner (the schooner) at a depth of 170 feet. The cargo holds contained, at the very least, wheat, barley, and nuts. The identity of the schooner was impossible to determine with complete certainty. Northeast asserted that the schooner was the General Wayne, a merchant vessel that had been converted into an American warship during the War of 1812. An archaeological research team suggested that the schooner was one of four possible historic ships, including the General Wayne. Regardless, the schooner appeared to have been undisturbed for at least 150 years. There was no indication that any salvage attempts had been made even though sufficient technology to locate and recover the vessel existed around the approximate time of the vessel’s wreck. No claims had been made by any owners or successors in interest of the General Wayne or the other possible vessels since the time of the wreck. Northeast filed an action in the district court to claim the shipwreck under admiralty law as finder of the vessel. The State of New York intervened. New York claimed title to the wreck under the Abandoned Shipwreck Act because the act vests title to abandoned shipwrecks in the state in which the wreck was found. New York moved for summary judgment, claiming that title automatically vested in the state under the Abandoned Shipwreck Act. Northeast filed a cross-motion for partial summary judgment, arguing the vessel was not abandoned and, alternatively, requested a salvage award. The district court found that the schooner had been abandoned, so title vested in the state. Northeast appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Livingston, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 788,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership