Northern Health Facilities v. Batz

993 F. Supp. 2d 485 (2014)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Northern Health Facilities v. Batz

United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
993 F. Supp. 2d 485 (2014)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Faith Batz (defendant) signed all the intake documents for her husband, John Batz, when he was admitted to the Tremont Health and Rehabilitation Center (the center) (plaintiff), a nursing home operated by Northern Health Facilities. Among the documents was an agreement requiring alternative dispute resolution (ADR) of all disputes related to John’s stay at the center. Because John was blind, he told the nurse who presented intake documents that Faith should sign them. Faith reviewed and signed all the documents. The nurse later said she believed John knew his wife signed all the documents because he was there the entire time she reviewed and signed them and he did nothing afterward to indicate Faith lacked his authority to sign them. In addition, the signature page of the ADR agreement where Faith signed as “Legal Representative” expressly stated that the center could rely on the representative’s signature based on the resident granting actual, implied, or apparent authority for the representative to sign. Two weeks later, John was still at the center when he allegedly suffered a deep-tissue injury. The injury deteriorated into necrotizing fasciitis and gangrene, requiring hospitalization and multiple operations. John developed a large open wound and died in home hospice eight days after his discharge from the hospital, two months after his admission to the center. Faith sued the center in state court on her own behalf and as John’s administratrix. The center in turn filed a federal action to stay the state-court proceedings and compel arbitration. Faith countered that the lack of John’s signature invalidated the ADR agreement.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mariani, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership