Northern Health Facilities v. Batz
United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
993 F. Supp. 2d 485 (2014)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Faith Batz (defendant) signed all the intake documents for her husband, John Batz, when he was admitted to the Tremont Health and Rehabilitation Center (the center) (plaintiff), a nursing home operated by Northern Health Facilities. Among the documents was an agreement requiring alternative dispute resolution (ADR) of all disputes related to John’s stay at the center. Because John was blind, he told the nurse who presented intake documents that Faith should sign them. Faith reviewed and signed all the documents. The nurse later said she believed John knew his wife signed all the documents because he was there the entire time she reviewed and signed them and he did nothing afterward to indicate Faith lacked his authority to sign them. In addition, the signature page of the ADR agreement where Faith signed as “Legal Representative” expressly stated that the center could rely on the representative’s signature based on the resident granting actual, implied, or apparent authority for the representative to sign. Two weeks later, John was still at the center when he allegedly suffered a deep-tissue injury. The injury deteriorated into necrotizing fasciitis and gangrene, requiring hospitalization and multiple operations. John developed a large open wound and died in home hospice eight days after his discharge from the hospital, two months after his admission to the center. Faith sued the center in state court on her own behalf and as John’s administratrix. The center in turn filed a federal action to stay the state-court proceedings and compel arbitration. Faith countered that the lack of John’s signature invalidated the ADR agreement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mariani, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.