Northern Pac. R.R. v. Charless

51 Fed. 562 (1892)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
N
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Northern Pac. R.R. v. Charless

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
51 Fed. 562 (1892)

RW

Facts

Hugh Charless (plaintiff) sued his employer, Northern Pacific Railroad Company (defendant), for injuries he suffered in a handcar accident. At trial, the judge allowed Charless to relate his version of the accident in full, instead of describing the accident by answering serial questions posed by his lawyer. After Charless completed his lengthy narrative, the railroad's lawyer objected that Charless made several inadmissible statements. The lawyer said he would have objected to each statement as it was made, but the narrative form of Charless's testimony gave the lawyer no opportunity to do so. The judge overruled the objection. The jury returned its verdict for Charless. On appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the railroad argued the judge exceeded his discretion in overruling its lawyer's objection.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Morrow, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Evidence

Key Terms