Northwest Airlines Corp. v. Association of Flight Attendants-CWA

483 F.3d 160 (2007)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Northwest Airlines Corp. v. Association of Flight Attendants-CWA

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
483 F.3d 160 (2007)

Facts

In 2004, Northwest Airlines Corporation (Northwest) (plaintiff) began renegotiating collective-bargaining agreements (CBAs) with its employees’ unions. In 2005, Northwest filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. After the union representing Northwest’s flight attendants rejected a tentative agreement with Northwest regarding new employment terms and conditions necessary for Northwest’s reorganization, the bankruptcy court allowed Northwest to reject its CBA with the union and implement the tentative agreement’s terms. The flight attendants subsequently replaced their union with the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA) (defendant). When Northwest implemented the terms of the tentative agreement, as authorized by the bankruptcy court, AFA notified Northwest that AFA intended to strike to disrupt Northwest’s service. Northwest moved to enjoin AFA from striking, but the bankruptcy court denied the motion. Under the Railway Labor Act (RLA), once a CBA between a union and a carrier subject to the RLA becomes amendable, the carrier and the union must engage in renegotiation, and the parties are obligated to maintain the status quo until a new agreement is reached. The bankruptcy court found that Northwest’s rejection of the CBA and implementation of the terms of the tentative agreement unilaterally changed the status quo between the parties, which allowed the flight attendants to strike. The district court reversed and granted injunctive relief, holding that Northwest had not unilaterally changed the status quo and thus that AFA remained bound by the RLA’s status-quo-maintaining prohibition of striking. AFA appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Walker, J.)

Concurrence (Jacobs, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership