Northwest Ecosystem Alliance v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
475 F.3d 1136 (2007)
- Written by Abby Keenan, JD
Facts
The western gray squirrel was once abundant in the Pacific Northwest and remained common in California and Oregon. The numbers of the western gray squirrel were declining in Washington, where it was found only in three isolated populations: the Puget Trough population, the North Cascades population, and the South Cascades population. The Northwest Ecosystem Alliance and the Tahoma Audubon Society (collectively, the alliance) (plaintiffs) petitioned the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) (defendant) to add an emergency endangered or threatened listing for the Washington population of the western gray squirrel under the Endangered Species Act. The FWS denied the petition. Based on studies, FWS found that differences in the types of trees in the Washington habitats did not compel a finding of a unique or unusual ecological setting, because western gray squirrels rely on a variety of tree species throughout their range. The FWS found that loss of the Washington population would not create a significant gap, because the FWS found no compelling evidence of any biological or behavioral differences in that population. The FWS determined that the genetic differences found in the Washington population were not great enough to support listing. The alliance sought review in federal district court, which granted summary judgment for the FWS. The alliance appealed to the Ninth Circuit, arguing that the FWS’s analysis was arbitrary and capricious.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Goodwin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.