Northwest Ecosystem Alliance v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service

475 F.3d 1136 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Northwest Ecosystem Alliance v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
475 F.3d 1136 (2007)

Facts

The western gray squirrel was once abundant in the Pacific Northwest and remained common in California and Oregon. The numbers of the western gray squirrel were declining in Washington, where it was found only in three isolated populations: the Puget Trough population, the North Cascades population, and the South Cascades population. The Northwest Ecosystem Alliance and the Tahoma Audubon Society (collectively, the alliance) (plaintiffs) petitioned the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) (defendant) to add an emergency endangered or threatened listing for the Washington population of the western gray squirrel under the Endangered Species Act. The FWS denied the petition. Based on studies, FWS found that differences in the types of trees in the Washington habitats did not compel a finding of a unique or unusual ecological setting, because western gray squirrels rely on a variety of tree species throughout their range. The FWS found that loss of the Washington population would not create a significant gap, because the FWS found no compelling evidence of any biological or behavioral differences in that population. The FWS determined that the genetic differences found in the Washington population were not great enough to support listing. The alliance sought review in federal district court, which granted summary judgment for the FWS. The alliance appealed to the Ninth Circuit, arguing that the FWS’s analysis was arbitrary and capricious.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Goodwin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership