Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Wood

947 F. Supp. 1371 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Wood

United States District Court for the District of Oregon
947 F. Supp. 1371 (1996)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

The Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) (defendant) issued a permit to Hyundai under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act to fill 10.4 acres of wetland to construct a semiconductor facility in Eugene, Oregon. The project was not water dependent. In the permit, the Corps listed detailed explanations for Hyundai building the semiconductor facility in Eugene, including proximity to customers, suppliers, and a major university. The Corps also stated that Hyundai had considered seven alternative sites in Eugene. The Corps concluded that issuance of the permit was in the public interest, after considering the environmental and human impacts of the project, the cumulative impacts, and thousands of pages of comments from the public and from state and federal agencies drawn from 1,200 comment letters and testimony from 200 public hearings. Northwest Environmental Defense Center (NWED) (plaintiff) challenged the permit, arguing the Corps violated the Clean Water Act by defining the project’s purpose too narrowly and that the need for a semiconductor facility was outweighed by the public’s interest in protecting the wetlands.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hogan, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership