Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Northwest Farm Bureau Insurance Company v. Althauser

Court of Appeals of Oregon
750 P.2d 1166 (1988)


Facts

Glenn and Grace Althauser (defendants) owned a house subject to two mortgages. The Althausers had a homeowner’s insurance policy with Northwest Farm Bureau Insurance Company (Northwest) (plaintiff). Under the policy, covered losses caused by fire were to be paid to the mortgagees named in the policy to the extent of their interests. The mortgagees would be paid even if the Althausers breached the insurance policy. The policy also covered personal property. The Althausers’ house was damaged in a fire. Northwest paid the full value of the mortgage to the first mortgagee, who then assigned the mortgage to Northwest. The remaining insurance proceeds were paid to the second mortgagee. The Althausers sued Northwest for the personal-property losses. Northwest denied liability for those losses, in part because it claimed that the Althausers had made a material misrepresentation. The jury found that the Alsthausers had made a material misrepresentation regarding the loss claim. Judgment was, therefore, entered for Northwest. Northwest then sued the Althausers, seeking to foreclose on the Althausers’ property, because the Althausers had not made any mortgage payments since the fire. Northwest claimed that the Althausers’ material misrepresentation nullified the Althausers’ policy with Northwest. As a result, Northwest was subrogated to the mortgagees’ rights.  The trial court granted Northwest’s summary judgment motion for foreclosure. The Althausers appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Joseph, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.