Northwest Farm Bureau Insurance Company v. Althauser
Oregon Court of Appeals
750 P.2d 1166 (1988)
- Written by Genan Zilkha, JD
Facts
Glenn and Grace Althauser (defendants) owned a house subject to two mortgages. The Althausers had a homeowner’s insurance policy with Northwest Farm Bureau Insurance Company (Northwest) (plaintiff). Under the policy, covered losses caused by fire were to be paid to the mortgagees named in the policy to the extent of their interests. The mortgagees would be paid even if the Althausers breached the insurance policy. The policy also covered personal property. The Althausers’ house was damaged in a fire. Northwest paid the full value of the mortgage to the first mortgagee, who then assigned the mortgage to Northwest. The remaining insurance proceeds were paid to the second mortgagee. The Althausers sued Northwest for the personal-property losses. Northwest denied liability for those losses, in part because it claimed that the Althausers had made a material misrepresentation. The jury found that the Alsthausers had made a material misrepresentation regarding the loss claim. Judgment was, therefore, entered for Northwest. Northwest then sued the Althausers, seeking to foreclose on the Althausers’ property, because the Althausers had not made any mortgage payments since the fire. Northwest claimed that the Althausers’ material misrepresentation nullified the Althausers’ policy with Northwest. As a result, Northwest was subrogated to the mortgagees’ rights. The trial court granted Northwest’s summary judgment motion for foreclosure. The Althausers appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Joseph, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.