Nottingdale Homeowners’ Association v. Darby
Ohio Supreme Court
514 N.E.2d 702 (1987)

- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
Darby and other unit owners at the Nottingdale Condominium (the delinquent unit owners) (defendants) quit paying their assessments for monthly services. The terms and conditions of the condominium, which all unit owners agreed to abide by when they purchased their units, provided that a delinquent unit owner would be responsible for paying the reasonable attorney’s fees incurred by the homeowners’ association (the association) (plaintiff) in any action for foreclosure or to collect delinquent assessments. The association sued the delinquent unit owners for the unpaid assessments, and the trial court ruled in favor of the association and awarded it attorney’s fees. The delinquent unit owners appealed, and the court of appeals reversed. The appellate court found that under state law, attorney fees were not to be awarded to the prevailing party unless there was statutory authorization, which was lacking in this case, or bad faith by the losing party. The association appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)
Dissent (Locher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.