Null v. Ohio Department of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities
Ohio Court of Appeals
137 Ohio App. 3d 152, 738 N.E.2d 105 (2000)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Anne Null (plaintiff) worked for the Ohio Department of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (the department) (defendant). The collective-bargaining agreement applicable to Null provided that employees would receive overtime pay for “authorized work” performed in excess of 40 hours per week. The collective-bargaining agreement also contained an arbitration clause that provided for final and binding arbitration of disputes arising under the agreement. Null brought an action against the department in Ohio state court, alleging that the department had violated the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act (the fair-wage statute) by failing to pay her overtime. The fair-wage statute provided that employers must provide overtime compensation in accordance with the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) for hours worked in excess of 40. The department asserted that the trial court did not have jurisdiction over Null’s claim because under Ohio Rev. Code § 4117.10(A), the binding arbitration provision in the collective-bargaining agreement barred Null’s fair-wage action. The trial court agreed and granted summary judgment for the department. Null appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bryant, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.