Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

O'Bannon v. NCAA

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
No. C 09-3329 CW (2014)


Facts

O’Bannon (plaintiff) brought a class action suit against the NCAA (defendant) for violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. O’Bannon claimed that NCAA rules prohibiting payment in addition to scholarships to student-athletes unreasonably restrained trade in the market for Division I educational and athletic opportunities. The NCAA claimed four procompetitive justifications for its rules: (1) a commitment to amateurism, (2) promotion of competitive balance among Division I teams, (3) the integration of academics and athletics, and (4) increased output of its product. O’Bannon put forth potential changes to the NCAA rules that would be less restrictive means of achieving the NCAA’s goals, including permitting payment of a stipend not to exceed the entire cost of attending college (i.e., including food and other expenses in addition to tuition) and allowing schools to hold payments in trust until the student-athletes leave school.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Wilken, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.