O'Bannon v. NCAA

No. C 09-3329 CW (2014)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
O
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

O'Bannon v. NCAA

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
No. C 09-3329 CW (2014)

SC
Play video

Facts

O’Bannon (plaintiff) brought a class action suit against the NCAA (defendant) for violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. O’Bannon claimed that NCAA rules prohibiting payment in addition to scholarships to student-athletes unreasonably restrained trade in the market for Division I educational and athletic opportunities. The NCAA claimed four procompetitive justifications for its rules: (1) a commitment to amateurism, (2) promotion of competitive balance among Division I teams, (3) the integration of academics and athletics, and (4) increased output of its product. O’Bannon put forth potential changes to the NCAA rules that would be less restrictive means of achieving the NCAA’s goals, including permitting payment of a stipend not to exceed the entire cost of attending college (i.e., including food and other expenses in addition to tuition) and allowing schools to hold payments in trust until the student-athletes leave school.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wilken, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Sports Law

Key Terms