O'Brien v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc'y
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
212 F.2d 383 (1954)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Mrs. O'Brien (plaintiff) claimed that her husband's violent killing was accidental, and therefore covered by his insurance policy's double indemnity clause. O'Brien sued Equitable Life Assurance Society (Equitable) (defendant) for double indemnity benefits. The law presumes violent death to be accidental, and this presumption was sufficient to establish O'Brien's prima facie case. However, Equitable produced substantial evidence in support of its theory that the husband was killed while committing a criminal assault. In rebuttal, O'Brien cast doubt on Equitable's evidence but offered no substantial evidence to refute it. The trial judge directed the jury's verdict in favor of Equitable. O'Brien appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, arguing that she established a prima facie case that should have been submitted for the jury's consideration.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Collet, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.