O'Brien v. Muskin Corp.
New Jersey Supreme Court
463 A.2d 298 (N.J. 1983)
Gary O’Brien (plaintiff) dove into a shallow, above ground pool manufactured by Muskin (defendant) and hit his head on the bottom, sustaining injuries. O’Brien brought suit on a theory of strict products liability, claiming that the pool was defectively designed because the bottom was slippery and the pool’s warning about diving was inadequate. The trial court instructed the jury on strict liability, but took from the jury the question of whether manufacturing a pool with a slippery vinyl liner constituted a design defect. The jury found in favor of Muskin. The appellate court reversed. The Supreme Court of New Jersey granted certification.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Pollock, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 171,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.