O'Connor Brothers Abalone Co. v. Brando
California Court of Appeal
114 Cal. Rptr. 773 (1974)
Wife Movita Brando and husband Marlon Brando (defendant) entered into a settlement agreement in 1968 to resolve custody and financial issues following the annulment of their marriage. Per the agreement, Marlon paid $600 monthly child-support payments and $1,400 monthly payments to support Movita. The $1,400 payments were to continue until the earlier of 156 months or until Movita died or remarried. The agreement defined “remarriage” to include Movita “appearing to maintain a marital relationship with any person.” Marlon stopped the $1,400 monthly payments in 1971, alleging that Movita had entered into a relationship with James Ford in 1968 that qualified as a remarriage under the agreement. The trial evidence showed that Movita and Ford had a relationship of substantial duration that included frequent sexual intercourse. In addition, Ford kept his clothes at Movita’s residence, prepared and ate meals there, bought groceries on Movita’s account at the store, drove Movita’s cars, and was authorized to use Movita’s department store charge account. Ford also used Movita’s address as his own, and he and Movita were often in public together, including with her children. Movita and Ford were not married, and Movita did not hold herself out as being married to Ford. The trial court found that, although Movita lived with Ford, because she did not have a marriage ceremony or hold herself out as being married, she was not remarried and remained eligible under the agreement for the support payments. Marlon appealed, alleging that the relationship between Movita and Ford constituted a remarriage under the agreement.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Compton, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.