O'Connor v. Chandris Lines, Inc.

566 F. Supp. 1275 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

O'Connor v. Chandris Lines, Inc.

United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
566 F. Supp. 1275 (1983)

Facts

Kevin O’Connor and Marion O’Connor (plaintiff) went on the cruise ship Victoria, which was owned and controlled by Chandris Lines, Inc. (defendant). The O’Connors were assigned to and were the only occupants of cabin E-57. Their cabin had two wooden bunk beds situated on top of each other. Kevin slept in the upper bunk, and Marion slept in the bottom bunk. Kevin weighed approximately 210 to 215 pounds. On the third night, while they both slept in their respective bunks and while the sea was calm, Kevin’s upper bunk suddenly and without warning broke from its mounting and fell directly on top of Marion as she slept in her bunk below. Marion sustained injuries to her head, chest, arm, and leg. Marion sued Chandris Lines for negligence. None of the crew of Chandris Lines testified about the condition of the cabin or the bunks prior to the accident. There was no evidence of how long the Victoria was in service. In addition, there was no evidence of how long the bunks in cabin E-57 had been in service or the last time they had been surveyed or inspected. The only people in cabin E-57 when the bunk collapsed and fell were Kevin and Marion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Julian, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership