O'Connor v. R. F. Lafferty & Co., Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
965 F.2d 893 (1992)
- Written by Rocco Sainato, JD
Facts
Carol O’Connor (plaintiff) came into a large sum of money from her divorce in 1975. O’Connor invested this entire sum with R. F. Lafferty & Co., Inc. (Lafferty) (defendant). O’Connor entrusted Lafferty with this sum due to the fact that one of its employees, Roy Foulke, was a family friend and had handled her family’s money in the past. Foulke was aware that O’Connor was using the investment account as her income, and that without it, she would not be able to live on her own. After a decade handling O’Connor’s account, Foulke invested her money in an oil company, as well as a pharmaceutical company. Both investments lost a significant amount of money. O’Connor then brought suit against Lafferty, alleging that the investments made by Foulke were unsuitable given her investment objectives. The district court ruled in favor of Lafferty. O’Connor then appealed to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brorby, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.