O'Grady v. Superior Court

44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 72, 139 Cal. App. 4th 1423 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

O'Grady v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal
44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 72, 139 Cal. App. 4th 1423 (2006)

Facts

Jason O’Grady and Kasper Jade (collectively, the website publishers) (defendants) operated separate popular online news magazines that regularly reported on Apple Computer, Inc. (Apple) (plaintiff) products and accessories. The websites published articles about an unannounced new Apple product, Asteroid, that included drawn renderings and the expected price and release date. Identical copies of Apple’s internal documents on the Asteroid were published on the websites. Apple filed a lawsuit in California state court in response to the leak and received permission to civilly subpoena the website publishers. The trial court denied a motion filed by the website publishers seeking a protective order because it found that the website publishers had engaged in the unlawful misappropriation of a trade secret. The website publishers appealed, arguing that they were protected under the California reporter’s shield law, which was extended to apply to reporters for periodical publications in 1974. Apple argued that the website publishers were not protected under the shield law, because they were not engaged in legitimate journalistic activities when they gathered the information and were not among the groups of people protected by the statute.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rushing, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership