From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
O'Keeffe v. Snyder
Supreme Court of New Jersey
416 A.2d 862 (1980)
In 1946, Georgia O’Keeffe (plaintiff) noticed that three of her paintings were missing from a gallery, but she did not report the pieces stolen until 1972. In 1975, O’Keeffe learned that her paintings were in a gallery in New York, and in March 1976 she brought suit in replevin against purchaser Barry Snyder (defendant). Snyder impleaded Ulrich Frank, who sold him the paintings. Frank claimed that his father had possession of the paintings for over 30 years. Snyder moved for summary judgment. Snyder asserted that he was a purchaser for value, he had title by adverse possession, and O’Keeffe’s action was barred by the applicable six-year statute of limitations. O’Keeffe filed a cross-motion arguing that the paintings were stolen, she had rightful title, and the statute of limitations had not run. The trial court granted Snyder’s motion, holding that the six-year limitations period for replevin actions started to run at the time of the theft. The appellate court reversed, granting judgment for O’Keeffe on the grounds that (1) the paintings were stolen, (2) the limitations period was the same as the adverse-possession period, and (3) Snyder failed to establish adverse possession (which the appellate court concluded he had the burden to demonstrate). Snyder appealed to the Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Pollock, J.)
Dissent (Handler, J.)
Dissent (Sullivan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.