O'Neill v. New York University

97 A.D.3d 199 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

O'Neill v. New York University

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
97 A.D.3d 199 (2012)

SC

Facts

Dr. David O’Neill (plaintiff) was a nontenured professor at New York University (NYU) (defendant). O’Neill worked pursuant to successive one-year contracts. The NYU Faculty Handbook (the handbook) stated that nontenured positions were “for a definite period of time.” The handbook also contained specific disciplinary policies for faculty. The NYU Code of Ethics (the code) required NYU faculty to report suspected violations of the code. The code included a promise from NYU that it would not retaliate for any reporting of suspected misconduct. O’Neill suspected that his supervisor was engaged in research misconduct, and he reported the suspicion to his superiors. NYU fired O’Neill, purportedly for O’Neill’s disrespectful behavior in his discussions with superiors about the suspected misconduct. O’Neill sued NYU for breach of contract on the ground that NYU retaliated against his reporting of suspected misconduct and did not follow the disciplinary process in the handbook. NYU filed a motion to dismiss. The New York Supreme Court found that O’Neill was an at-will employee and could be fired without cause. O’Neill appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moskowitz, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership