O'Riley v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Missouri Court of Appeals
412 S.W.3d 400 (2013)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Donald O’Riley created a trust with U.S. Bank, N.A. (defendant) as the trustee. Per the trust’s terms, when Donald died, the trust estate was divided into a marital trust and a nonmarital trust. As to the nonmarital trust, the trust agreement stated that U.S. Bank had absolute discretion to periodically distribute as much net income from trust assets to Donald’s wife, Arlene O’Riley, as deemed advisable to provide for her care, support, maintenance, and welfare. If any net income remained after paying Arlene as the preferred beneficiary, then U.S. Bank had absolute discretion to distribute as much of the remaining income to Donald’s sons, Terrance and Gerald O’Riley (plaintiffs) as deemed advisable to provide for their respective care, support, maintenance, education, and welfare. Arlene made annual requests for income, submitting records of her income and expenses to U.S. Bank as support. The expenses were consistent with the lifestyle that Arlene and Donald lived prior to Donald’s death. U.S. Bank distributed the trust’s net income to Arlene in accordance with her requests but refused most of Terrance’s requests for income and distributed only minimal amounts. Terrance and Gerald sued, alleging that U.S. Bank abused its discretionary authority by making unreasonable distributions that failed to balance the beneficiaries’ respective needs. The trial court held in U.S. Bank’s favor. Terrance and Gerald appealed to the Missouri Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Howard, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.