Oak Ridge Construction v. Tolley
Pennsylvania Superior Court
504 A.2d 1343 (1985)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Tolleys hired Oak Ridge Construction (Oak Ridge) to build a house on their land. Due to the depth of nearby wells, Oak Ridge was forced to dig the Tolleys’ well deeper than anticipated. Oak Ridge charged the Tolleys extra for this additional depth. Upon receiving the invoice, the Tolleys wrote to Oak Ridge, stating that the charges were “in dispute or disagreement” and asking for arbitration of the charges. Oak Ridge ceased performance and gave notice that it was terminating the contract pursuant to its termination provision. The trial court ruled that the Tolleys anticipatorily breached the contract, thus justifying Oak Ridge’s termination of the contract. The Tolleys appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hoffman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.