Oberdorf v. Amazon.com Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
930 F.3d 136 (2019)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Heather Oberdorf (plaintiff) bought a dog collar using Amazon.com Inc.’s (defendant’s) Marketplace. Third-party vendor The Furry Gang filled the order and shipped the collar. Oberdorf put the collar on her dog and clipped a retractable leash to the d-ring. When the dog lunged, the d-ring broke, and the leash snapped back, hitting Oberdorf’s glasses and blinding her in one eye. Oberdorf sued Amazon for negligence and strict liability. Neither Oberdorf nor Amazon could locate The Furry Gang. Amazon requires vendors to indemnify it and provide product warnings, and Amazon retains the right to reject vendors, but Marketplace customers cannot communicate directly with vendors. The trial court granted summary judgment for Amazon, reasoning it did not qualify as a seller under Pennsylvania products-liability law. The trial court also found that the Communications Decency Act (CDA), which precludes liability for publishing third-party content online, barred Oberdorf’s claims. Oberdorf appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Roth, J.)
Dissent (Scirica, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.