Ocasio v. United States
United States Supreme Court
578 U.S. 282, 136 S. Ct. 1423 (2016)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Two brothers (defendants) owned a struggling auto-repair shop. The brothers convinced police officer Samuel Ocasio and other local police officers (defendants) to refer people involved in automobile accidents to the brothers’ shop to have their cars repaired. In exchange, the brothers would pay the officers between $150 to $300 for each referral. The officers were eventually charged with violating the Hobbs Act by extorting money from the brothers. In addition, the brothers and the officers were charged with conspiring to violate the Hobbs Act. Ocasio was convicted of the regular Hobbs Act violations and the conspiracy charge. On appeal, Ocasio argued that his conspiracy conviction was impossible because, as a matter of law, (1) a person could not conspire to extort money from a coconspirator and (2) a public official could not conspire with a layperson to commit extortion because a layperson could not commit the act of extortion. The United States Supreme Court agreed to review the issue.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Alito, J.)
Concurrence (Breyer, J.)
Dissent (Sotomayor, J.)
Dissent (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.