Ocasio v. United States

578 U.S. 282, 136 S. Ct. 1423 (2016)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ocasio v. United States

United States Supreme Court
578 U.S. 282, 136 S. Ct. 1423 (2016)

Facts

Two brothers (defendants) owned a struggling auto-repair shop. The brothers convinced police officer Samuel Ocasio and other local police officers (defendants) to refer people involved in automobile accidents to the brothers’ shop to have their cars repaired. In exchange, the brothers would pay the officers between $150 to $300 for each referral. The officers were eventually charged with violating the Hobbs Act by extorting money from the brothers. In addition, the brothers and the officers were charged with conspiring to violate the Hobbs Act. Ocasio was convicted of the regular Hobbs Act violations and the conspiracy charge. On appeal, Ocasio argued that his conspiracy conviction was impossible because, as a matter of law, (1) a person could not conspire to extort money from a coconspirator and (2) a public official could not conspire with a layperson to commit extortion because a layperson could not commit the act of extortion. The United States Supreme Court agreed to review the issue.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Alito, J.)

Concurrence (Breyer, J.)

Dissent (Sotomayor, J.)

Dissent (Thomas, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership