Ochoco Lumber Co. v. Fibrex & Shipping Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
994 P.2d 793 (2000)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Fibrex & Shipping Co., Inc. (Fibrex) (defendant) obtained a loan for $3.9 million from West One Idaho Bank (West One). As security, West One obtained personal guarantees from the sole shareholders of Fibrex, Akira Saheki and his wife (defendants). West One required a standby letter of credit for $3.9 million. Fibrex obtained the letter of credit through an intermediary, Ochoco Lumber Company (Ochoco) (plaintiff). Fibrex agreed to sell logs to Ochoco, and Ochoco provided the necessary letter of credit, issued by First Interstate Bank. The letter of credit secured both Ochoco’s obligation to purchase the lumber and the loan from West One to Fibrex. Fibrex defaulted on the loan, and the letter of credit was used to pay it off. Ochoco reimbursed First Interstate Bank for the amount paid pursuant to the letter of credit and sought to enforce West One’s rights against Fibrex and the Sahekis under a theory of equitable subrogation. West One refused to recognize the equitable subrogation rights asserted by Ochoco. Ochoco sued, seeking a declaration that Ochoco was subrogated to West One’s rights and enforcement of those rights against Fibrex and the Sahekis. The trial court dismissed Ochoco’s claims, ruling that neither the applicant nor the issuer of a standby letter of credit can be subrogated to the beneficiary’s claims. Ochoco appealed to the Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kistler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.