Odd Jobs & More v. Reid
Arkansas Court of Appeals
2011 Ark. App. 450 (2011)
- Written by Whitney Punzone, JD
Facts
Rosewell Reid (plaintiff) worked as a painter for Odd Jobs & More (Odd Jobs) (defendant). On June 4, 2009, while working at an apartment complex in a bad neighborhood, Reid was hit in the back of the head by Shannon Bradford, a third party. Reid sustained injuries to his skull. Reid filed for workers’-compensation benefits. Odd Jobs and its insurance carrier, Nationwide Insurance Company (Nationwide) (defendant), contested the claim and argued that the injuries were not compensable. A hearing was held before an administrative-law judge (ALJ). Testimony was given revealing that the apartment complex Reid was working in when he was attacked was previously in a special program with 24-hour surveillance due to criminal activity and that the apartment complex could again qualify for the special program. Bradford had attacked another individual a few days prior to his attack on Reid, and there were many police reports of violent acts that occurred at the apartment complex. The ALJ awarded benefits to Reid, and the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission (the commission) affirmed the award, finding that the risk of assault was increased by the setting of Reid’s work. Odd Jobs and Nationwide appealed, arguing that the injury did not arise out of or in the course of Reid’s employment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wynne, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.