Odum v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
North Carolina Court of Appeals
401 S.E.2d 87 (1991)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
North Carolina law required all licensed drivers to maintain at least minimal automobile-insurance coverage and provided that once an accident occurred, an insurer’s liability became absolute and could not be voided by any statement or policy violation by the insured driver. Following Arnetta McPhaul’s death in a car accident, Levata Odum (plaintiff), the administratrix of McPhaul’s estate, filed a claim against Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide) (defendant), which had insured McPhaul for twice the coverage mandated by state law. Nationwide denied indemnification on the grounds that McPhaul obtained her policy under false pretenses. Odum sued to enforce Nationwide’s policy. The trial court ruled in Odum’s favor. Nationwide appealed to the North Carolina Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.