Office Supply Co., Inc. v. Basic/Four Corporation
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
538 F. Supp. 776 (1982)
- Written by Joseph Bowman, JD
Facts
Office Supply Co., Inc. (Office Supply) (plaintiff) negotiated the purchase of computer hardware and lease of software from Basic/Four Corporation (Basic) (defendant). Office Supply President James Bruno tried to renegotiate Basic’s ninety-day express warranty, but Basic refused. Among its terms, the final sale contract included the ninety-day express warranty, an italicized disclaimer of all other express or implied warranties, and an integration clause. The software lease was incorporated into the sale contract. After the ninety-day period had expired, defects with the software system arose. Office Supply brought suit for lost income and expenses related to the defective software, claiming Basic warranted future performance and that the warranty disclaimer was ineffective. Both Office Supply and Basic moved the court for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Reynolds, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 819,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.