Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. Tallentire
United States Supreme Court
477 U.S. 207, 106 S.Ct. 2485, 91 L.Ed.2d 174, 1986 AMC 2113 (1986)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Corrine Taylor and Beth Tallentire (plaintiffs) were the widows of two offshore-drilling-platform workers who were killed in the crash of a helicopter owned and operated by Offshore Logistics, Inc. (defendant). The crash occurred approximately 35 miles off the coast of Louisiana when the men were being transported by the helicopter from a drilling platform back to shore. Taylor and Tallentire sued Offshore Logistics under the Death on the High Seas Act (DOHSA), the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), and the Louisiana wrongful-death statute. The actions were consolidated in federal court in Louisiana. Offshore Logistics moved for partial summary judgment, claiming that DOHSA provided the sole remedy for the claim and seeking the dismissal of the claims under OCSLA and the state law. The district court granted the motion, agreeing that the cause of action fell exclusively under DOHSA. Offshore Logistics admitted liability, and the court awarded damages for pecuniary loss, as allowed under DOHSA, but not for any nonpecuniary losses, which were not provided under the statute. Taylor and Tallentire appealed the dismissal of their claims under OCSLA and the Louisiana wrongful-death statute. The court of appeals reversed the district court’s decision, holding that Taylor and Tallentire could seek recovery under the Louisiana state law. Offshore Logistics appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.