Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. Tallentire

477 U.S. 207, 106 S.Ct. 2485, 91 L.Ed.2d 174, 1986 AMC 2113 (1986)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. Tallentire

United States Supreme Court
477 U.S. 207, 106 S.Ct. 2485, 91 L.Ed.2d 174, 1986 AMC 2113 (1986)

Facts

Corrine Taylor and Beth Tallentire (plaintiffs) were the widows of two offshore-drilling-platform workers who were killed in the crash of a helicopter owned and operated by Offshore Logistics, Inc. (defendant). The crash occurred approximately 35 miles off the coast of Louisiana when the men were being transported by the helicopter from a drilling platform back to shore. Taylor and Tallentire sued Offshore Logistics under the Death on the High Seas Act (DOHSA), the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), and the Louisiana wrongful-death statute. The actions were consolidated in federal court in Louisiana. Offshore Logistics moved for partial summary judgment, claiming that DOHSA provided the sole remedy for the claim and seeking the dismissal of the claims under OCSLA and the state law. The district court granted the motion, agreeing that the cause of action fell exclusively under DOHSA. Offshore Logistics admitted liability, and the court awarded damages for pecuniary loss, as allowed under DOHSA, but not for any nonpecuniary losses, which were not provided under the statute. Taylor and Tallentire appealed the dismissal of their claims under OCSLA and the Louisiana wrongful-death statute. The court of appeals reversed the district court’s decision, holding that Taylor and Tallentire could seek recovery under the Louisiana state law. Offshore Logistics appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership