Ogle v. Fuiten

466 N.E.2d 224 (1984)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ogle v. Fuiten

Illinois Supreme Court
466 N.E.2d 224 (1984)

SC

Facts

Oscar and Anna Smith hired William Fuiten to draft their wills. In the wills, the Smiths each left their estate to the other as long as the other survived the testator by 30 days. The wills stated that if the Smiths died in a common accident, their estates would pass to their nephews, James and Leland Ogle (plaintiffs). In effect, the wills did not have any provisions to devise the estates to anyone if the Smiths died within 30 days of each other but not from a common accident. Anna died 15 days after Oscar, leaving their estates to pass by intestate succession. The Ogles sued the executrix of the estate of Fuiten, who had died, as well as Fuiten’s law partner (defendants) for negligent drafting of the wills and for breach of contract. The Ogles claimed that the Smiths did not intend to let their estates pass by intestacy. Fuiten’s executrix and law partner filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. The circuit court granted the motion. The appellate court reversed. Fuiten’s executrix and law partner appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Goldenhersh, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership