Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
United States Supreme Court
301 U.S. 292 (1937)
The Public Utilities Commission (PUC) (defendant) opened a proceeding to set the rates of Ohio Bell Telephone Company (Ohio Bell) (plaintiff). After holding administrative hearings in the proceeding, the PUC had sufficient evidence to ascertain the value of Ohio Bell’s property as of 1925. The PUC set a rate for 1925 based on this evidence. The PUC then set rates for the years 1926 to 1933 by taking official notice of price trends based on property taxes, construction price indexes, and court findings with respect to an Ohio Bell affiliate. The PUC did not include these price trends or their bases in the record. The rates the PUC set for 1926 to 1933 resulted in significant refunds due to Ohio Bell’s customers. Ohio Bell filed a suit to challenge the PUC’s order. Ohio Bell claimed that by not affording it the opportunity to respond to the PUC’s use of the price trends, the PUC violated its procedural due process rights. The matter was appealed to the Supreme Court of Ohio, which affirmed the order. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cardozo, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 687,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 687,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 43,000 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.