Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Ohio Forestry Association, Inc. v. Sierra Club

United States Supreme Court
523 U.S. 726 (1998)


The National Forest Management Act of 1976 requires the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) to develop, maintain, and revise land and resource management plans for units of the National Forest Service (NFS). The NFS developed a plan for the Wayne National Forest, which is located in Ohio. Under the Plan, certain amounts of logging and clearcutting were permitted, though the Plan itself did not authorize the cutting of trees. Before logging could occur under the Plan, the NFS was required to take a number of steps, such as ensuring that the project was consistent with the Plan and that those affected by the proposed logging had notice and an opportunity to be heard. The Sierra Club (plaintiff) challenged the lawfulness of the Plan in federal court, suing the NFS, the Secretary, the Regional Forester, and the Forest Supervisor (defendants). In its suit, the Sierra Club argued that the Plan improperly allowed for too much logging and clearcutting. The Ohio Forestry Association (defendant), members of which harvest timber in or process wood products from the Wayne National Forest, intervened as a defendant. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 203,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.