Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Ohio Grain Co. v. Swisshelm

318 N.E.2d 428 (1973)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

Ohio Grain Co. v. Swisshelm

Ohio Court of Appeals

318 N.E.2d 428 (1973)

Facts

A representative of Ohio Grain Co. (OG) (plaintiff) spoke on the phone with Swisshelm (defendant) about buying soybeans. Swisshelm was a livestock farmer. However, he also dabbled in corn and soybeans, following the markets for these crops and basically knowing that their prices varied with the crops’ quality. During the phone conversation, Swisshelm offered to sell soybeans to OG for $5 a bushel. OG accepted the offer, even though OG had not yet seen the soybeans and did not know the soybeans’ quality. After the conversation, OG sent a confirmation letter to Swisshelm to affirm the purchase of 1500 bushels of soybeans at $5 per bushel. The letter also specified various quality requirements for the soybeans and stated that the price would be lowered if the soybeans did not meet the standards. The letter left space for Swisshelm’s signature and asked that it be signed and returned. The letter also included a note at the bottom saying that keeping the letter without telling OG there was anything wrong with the terms would be an acceptance of the stated terms. Prior to the delivery date given in OG’s confirmation letter, Swisshelm sold the soybeans to someone else. OG had committed to selling the soybeans it expected to receive from Swisshelm, but OG was able to purchase other soybeans for $1,500 more than what the soybeans would have cost under the Swisshelm agreement. OG sued Swisshelm to recover the monetary damage OG suffered. The trial court held that no contract had been formed between the parties and ruled in favor of Swisshelm. OG appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Crawford, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership