Ohio v. American Express Co.

138 S. Ct. 2274, 585 U.S. 529, 201 L.Ed.2d 678 (2018)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
O
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ohio v. American Express Co.

United States Supreme Court
138 S. Ct. 2274, 585 U.S. 529, 201 L.Ed.2d 678 (2018)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company (together, Amex) (defendants) provide credit-card services to merchants and consumers. Amex charges merchants higher fees than other companies but offers cardholders greater rewards. Amex merchants enter agreements with antisteering provisions that prohibit discouraging customers from using Amex cards at the point of sale. The United States and several states (plaintiffs) sued Amex, claiming that its antisteering provision violated antitrust laws. The trial court found that credit-card transactions should be treated as two separate transactions for antitrust purposes: paying the merchant and extending the customer credit. Analyzing the merchant side, the court found Amex’s antisteering provisions anticompetitive because they resulted in higher merchant fees. But the Second Circuit reversed, reasoning that the credit-card market is just one market. The United States Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)

Dissent (Breyer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Antitrust

Key Terms