Oil Shipping B.V. v. Sonmez Denizcilik Ve Ticaret A.S.; the Ziya S
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
10 F.3d 1015, 1994 AMC 892 (1993)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
The Ziya S (defendant) was a bulk-carrier ship chartered by Sonmez Denizcilik Ve Ticaret A.S. (Sonmez) (defendant), a Turkish shipping company. The Ziya S’s owner, Northwest, had obtained a mortgage over the vessel held by the Royal Bank of Scotland (Royal Bank), and Sonmez was a guarantor on the mortgage. Sonmez entered into a number of contracts for the provisioning of the Ziya S with a number of suppliers, including Oil Shipping B.V. (plaintiff) and Baytur Trading S.A. (Baytur). Baytur had provided multiple fuel deliveries to the Ziya S in Turkey. Sonmez failed to pay the suppliers, and Northwest and Sonmez eventually defaulted on the mortgage. When the Ziya S entered a United States port, Oil Shipping filed a complaint in district court against Sonmez and against the Ziya S in rem. The vessel was arrested, and Royal Bank and Baytur both intervened in the suit. The Ziya S was sold, but the proceeds were insufficient to fully pay all of the claims. After the proceeds were initially distributed, the district court ruled that the Ship Mortgage Act was the applicable law to determine priority among the remaining claims. The court further ruled that Royal Bank had priority over Baytur under the Ship Mortgage Act and entered summary judgment for Royal Bank. Baytur appealed, alleging that Turkish law should have been applied in determining the priority of the claims.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hutchinson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.