Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
600 F.3d 1205 (2010)
- Written by Genan Zilkha, JD
Facts
Patrick Ojo (plaintiff), a homeowner, resides in Texas and has a homeowner’s policy with Farmers Group, Inc. (Farmers) (defendant). Ojo sued Farmers on his own behalf and on behalf of other minorities (plaintiffs). Ojo claimed that Farmers used undisclosed factors in its credit-scoring system that disparately impacted minorities, therefore violating the Fair Housing Act (FHA). The credit-scoring system impacted the ability of minorities to obtain housing insurance. Farmers moved to dismiss. The district court granted Farmers’ motion to dismiss, holding that the FHA was reverse-preempted by the Texas Insurance Code. Ojo appealed. A panel of three judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the finding of the district court and held that the FHA was not reverse-preempted by Texas law. The Ninth Circuit ordered the case reheard en banc.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.