Oka v. Youssefyeh

849 F.2d 581 (1988)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Oka v. Youssefyeh

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
849 F.2d 581 (1988)

Facts

Oka (appellant) and Youssefyeh (respondent) argued an interference proceeding before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, having both invented chemical compounds with certain desirable properties. Oka was the senior party, having filed first on October 31, 1980. Youssefyeh had filed later but sought to prove that he was in fact the first to invent, making him the junior party in the interference. Under 35 U.S.C. §102(g), one who invents first but files second may still be entitled to a patent, and the Board determines which party is so entitled. Within the broad class of chemical compounds claimed, various developments were observed by the court in determining where Youssefyeh’s invention date should rest. As between the two chemical compound subgroups of importance, 2-indanyl and 5-indanyl, Youssefyeh first acquired the idea of a particular 2-indanyl subgroup in February 1980 and it was put in writing. Though Youssefyeh claims that his conception date is February 1980, specific evidence showed that one of skill in the art was unable to create this compound at the time. Youssefyeh possessed a method of making a similar compound as of October 10, 1980 and was able to make the 5-indanyl subgroup with that method in December 1980. Finally, in January 1981, Youssefyeh was able to make the 2-indanyl compound. The district court held that Youssefyeh was the first to invent as of October 10, 1980. After the Board awarded Youssefyeh priority of invention, Oka appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Markey, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership