Oklahoma District Council of the Assemblies of God of the State of Oklahoma, Inc. v. New Hope Assembly of God Church of Norman, Oklahoma, Inc.
Oklahoma Supreme Court
597 P.2d 1211 (1979)
- Written by Sarah Hoffman, JD
Facts
New Hope Assembly of God Church of Norman, Oklahoma, Inc. (New Hope) (defendant) had been an affiliated member of the Oklahoma District Council of the Assemblies of God of the State of Oklahoma, Inc. (the District Council) (plaintiff). The District Council withdrew its recognition of New Hope, but New Hope continued to use the same name, which included the words “Assembly of God.” The District Council filed suit against New Hope requesting that it be permanently enjoined from using a name containing the words “Assembly of God.” The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the District Council. No evidence was presented as to whether the term “Assemble of God” had acquired a secondary meaning. New Hope appealed. On appeal, the District Council argued that the term “Assemble of God” had acquired a secondary meaning entitling it to trademark protection.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Irwin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.