Oklahoma Plaza Investors v. Wal-Mart Stores

203 B.R. 479 (1994)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Oklahoma Plaza Investors v. Wal-Mart Stores

United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
203 B.R. 479 (1994)

RW

Facts

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (defendant) opened a discount store in a shopping center that it leased from Oklahoma Plaza Investors, Ltd. (OPI) (plaintiff). The lease recited Wal-Mart’s intention to operate a discount store at the shopping center but added that “the store may be used for any lawful purpose.” The lease’s definition of default included desertion of the premises or failure to pay rent. Eventually, Wal-Mart closed the store, removed its fixtures, and papered over its windows. Thereafter, Wal-Mart continued paying rent on the space and used it for storage and occasional meetings. Nevertheless, OPI sued Wal-Mart. A federal bankruptcy court found that Wal-Mart had breached a lease that was complete and unambiguous on its face. Wal-Mart appealed to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ellison, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership