Oklahoma Plaza Investors v. Wal-Mart Stores
United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
203 B.R. 479 (1994)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (defendant) opened a discount store in a shopping center that it leased from Oklahoma Plaza Investors, Ltd. (OPI) (plaintiff). The lease recited Wal-Mart’s intention to operate a discount store at the shopping center but added that “the store may be used for any lawful purpose.” The lease’s definition of default included desertion of the premises or failure to pay rent. Eventually, Wal-Mart closed the store, removed its fixtures, and papered over its windows. Thereafter, Wal-Mart continued paying rent on the space and used it for storage and occasional meetings. Nevertheless, OPI sued Wal-Mart. A federal bankruptcy court found that Wal-Mart had breached a lease that was complete and unambiguous on its face. Wal-Mart appealed to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ellison, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.