Olam v. Congress Mortgage Co.
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
68 F. Supp. 2d 1110 (1999)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
Congress Mortgage Company (company) (defendant) foreclosed on Donna Olam’s (plaintiff) property. Olam filed suit against the company, alleging consumer-law violations. At the request of the trial court, Olam and the company agreed to participate in mediation and reached a settlement agreement. Olam and the company consulted with counsel and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that memorialized the agreement. However, Olam later failed to comply with the agreement terms, and the company filed a motion to enforce the MOU. Olam filed an opposition, claiming that the agreement was not enforceable because she was under undue influence when she signed the MOU. Olam alleged that she was suffering from physical and emotional distress and that she felt pressured to sign the MOU despite not understanding the terms. Olam and the company informed the district court that they wanted the mediator to testify as to what occurred during the mediation, despite California’s codified protections for mediation communications.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brazil, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.