Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner
United States Supreme Court
279 U.S. 716 (1929)
William M. Wood (defendant) served as the president of the American Woolen Company from the years 1918 to 1920. In 1916, the American Woolen Company adopted a resolution to pay the income taxes of the company’s officers. For earnings in 1918, Wood owed $681,169.88 in federal taxes. For earnings in 1919, Wood owed $351,179.27 in federal taxes. In accordance with its 1916 resolution, the American Woolen Company paid Wood’s taxes for both years. The Board of Tax Appeals found that the tax payments made by the company on Woods’ behalf constituted additional income.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Taft, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.